Whose Religious Rights Are More Important, Employer or Patient or Employee

You hear that phrase a lot, everyone should be entitled to their religious freedom, their religious beliefs. But, is that what is really happening?  The recent debate about birth control and the case the Catholic Church is bringing against the Obama administration raises some serious questions. To me religious freedom means being able to choose whatever religion you like and have the ability to follow their doctrine.  That brings up a few issues, number one being, if you aren’t religious at all and don’t believe in it you should have the same rights and respects others have; freedom of religion also means freedom to not be religious.  I can understand churches and synagogues having their religion they believe in practiced at their place of worship.  The fact that they are on tax deductible land is something that should be looked into, why are they able to have that status?  But having a place of worship where people have the same beliefs makes sense; I mean I know there are heated discussions within these communities but their underlying belief is the same.  But argument and venting ideas is healthy, positive and will make people understand things better or differently.

When you get into employment the earth shifts. If you work at a Catholic institution your freedom of religion should be respected more than the institutions freedom of religion.  When you are an employer you need bow to your employees freedom of religion, not the freedom of the employing institution.  In this economy, and actually in any economy at all, people need jobs, they need a source of income. If they choose to work in a religious affiliated hospital or other venue, their personal freedom of religion should be respected. Theirs, not the institutions.  So if you are an employer, a hospital lets say, the benefits you over need to be in line with what your competition offers, not what you believe in religiously.  It’s the individual worker who uses their religious freedom to decide what path they want to take.  If contraceptives are against their faith and beliefs they don’t have to get them. Its the big guy against the little guy all over again.  The place of work should offer benefits that are in line with their competition, its the individual to express their religious freedom by utilizing or not utilizing the benefits.

In 1993 my 86 year old grandmother had a stroke; she had been in perfect health every day of her life before that.  My father being a medical Dr. knew that the stroke she suffered from had irreversible damage, she would never be the same.  My grandmother had a living will, she did not want to be on life support if her life was gone.  My father on the way to the hospital gave instructions of her wishes and told the Dr.’s not to feed or try to revive her; following her wishes.  It was a Catholic hospital so they ignored her wishes and my fathers orders and fed her.  When my father got there he changed the situation and in forced my grandmothers desires and freedom of religion.  A Catholic hospital should abide by its patients wishes, not by their own wishes.  Freedom of religion is a personal thing not a business thing.

People need to look a lot closer at this kind of thing, do you want your wishes followed through on;or do you want them ignored because an ambulance brings you to a hospital thats closest to you but doesn’t respect your religious freedom.


2 thoughts on “Whose Religious Rights Are More Important, Employer or Patient or Employee

  1. Wow I lost my reply! oh vey! So, in essence, I said that no religious RULES should come into play with healthcare and treatment in any healthcare facility. Totally ludicrous, in my humble opinion. People are dealing with enough emotional trauma as it is without having to be hit by such things.

    I was a cradle catholic and moved on to a born again Christian in my twenties, to now being a spiritual person and I believe in many paths to one God and respect all faiths.

    and now for what I read right after reading your article here: ‘For Going Against God’s Will’ Catholic Hospital Denies Gay Man HIV Meds: http://goo.gl/Bkltq

    1. I’ve been meaning to respond for days now! My background couldn’t be more different than yours, I was brought up Jewish, my parents were not religious, they’d make us go to the high holiday services. My parents were always too honesty with me, I remember when I was young asking my father if he wanted to go to the high holiday services or felt like he had to because all of their friends were Jewish Dr.s; he told me he felt both which made me think he wasn’t that into it either. And for my mother the services were always the debut of her new fall wardrobe. I am not religious at all now, but I really like the idea of spirituality.

      Anyway, I agree 100% that religious rules should have nothing to do with what kind of treatment patients want; even at religious affiliated hospitals. That story about a Catholic hospital denying meds is outrageous. It should be criminal and they should lose their license for either the entire hospital or the dr. that made the decision.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s